In order for us to have peace, we must be free – we must have sovereignty over our lives, our bodies and our consciousness. Sovereignty also requires responsibility. It means that we must cultivate the necessary faculties and skills to be able to discern right from wrong and truth from lie.
In the face of false authority, unjust laws and dishonourable leaders, we must turn to Natural Law and our true origins to decipher our inherent rights.
In these turbulent times, more than ever we must guard our right to freedom of thought, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of consciousness.
“Freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed.“
“There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe nor politic nor popular, but he must take it because his conscience tells him it is right.”
“A man dies when he refuses to stand up for that which is right. A man dies when he refuses to stand up for justice. A man dies when he refuses to take a stand for that which is true.”
-Martin Luther King, Jr.
One of the fundamental human rights is our right to having sovereignty over our physical bodies. This means that we should be free to choose the medical treatment and remedies we wish to take.
No institution should be granted the permission to overrule our own conscious decisions regarding our health.
No entity should have the authority to mandate an injection or other medical procedure to someone without their prior, free and informed consent. Medical freedom is at the core of our activism and although the subject of vaccination is controversial, we do not fear to speak up about it.
“Universal Declaration on Bio-ethics and Human Rights
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.
3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, 19 October 2005 UNESCO”
“Vaccination is a barbarous practice and one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time. Conscientious objectors to vaccination should stand alone, if need be, against the whole world, in defence of their conviction.”
“We’ve got to stop calling chickenpox and measles diseases, because they’re not. They’re infections, and infections come and go in a week to ten days, and leave behind a lifetime of immunity. A disease is something that comes and stays, and frequently can’t be cured. So when you vaccinate to avoid an infection, what you potentially are doing is causing a disease.”
-Dr. Sherri J. Tenpenny D.O., Board Certified in Emergency Medicine and Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine
“The medical authorities keep lying. Vaccination has been a disaster on the immune system. It actually causes a lot of illnesses. We are changing our genetic code through vaccination.”
-Guylaine Lanctot M.D., author of the best-seller ‘Medical Mafia’
“It is pathetic and ludicrous to say we ever vanquished smallpox with vaccines, when only 10% of the population was ever vaccinated.”
-Dr. Glen Dettman
Freedom to express oneself is a fundamental human right, and it is imperative for us to also protect the rights of those who identify as transgender. These individuals are often discriminated against and emotionally tormented for their different appearance and behaviour. However, we must be very careful not to confuse the need for emotional support and therapy with fraudulent medical practices. At the core of gender dysphoria is a desire to get out of the biological sex one was born into, and no medical treatment can possibly achieve that.
The suicide risk of people who have undergone a sex reassignment surgery goes up 19-fold according to the most thorough follow-up research done about the subject in Sweden.
Also the risk for suicide attempts grew 4.9 times and the risk for psychiatric hospitalisation was 2.8 times greater than in the controls.
It is a biological impossibility to change one’s sex. No matter the hormonal or surgical treatment, the biological gender and the chromosomes of the individual remain intact. Only the appearance of the body, the expression of the genitals and hormonal system can be altered, but they can never be totally transformed. Therefore it is a lie, and a very damaging one, to convince someone who desperately wishes to change their sex, that medical procedures can actually do that.
We must speak up about the risks of sex reassignment therapy and surgery. There are online communities and support groups for those who have come to regret the sex change treatment they took, and began the process of de-transitioning. Teenagers should be encouraged to be patient through the challenging time of puberty, when their physical body, identity and sexual desires undergo monumental changes.
Mutilating and altering the healthy body of an individual cannot be considered sound, ethical healthcare practice.
In fact, there is insufficient data to prove that these cross-sex hormone therapies and sex reassignment operations are even physically safe.
It is also common that people with gender dysphoria suffer with a plethora of psychological conditions like depression and trauma from childhood abuse. Rather than rushing on ahead and convincing people to take serious measures that they have to answer to for the rest of their lives, let’s offer them a lot of love, safety and support.
“Changing sexes is a metaphysical impossibility because it is a biological impossibility.”
-Robert P. George, Princeton philosopher
“I soon came to the realisation that what I have is an open wound, not a vagina. I was blinded by the amount of harmful support that I got. - I honestly don’t understand how this surgery is even legal. It butchers a healthy body and comes with life threatening side effects.”
”We’ve been given only one option, at the risk of unspeakable, devastating consequences: if a teen says she has gender dysphoria and wants to be a boy, then she should — must — be allowed to transition.
That’s the story we’ve been sold, and it’s the only story we’ve been sold. And de-transitioners are an inconvenient contradiction to this story.”
“There is too much unhappiness among people who have had the surgery. Too many end in suicide.”
-Endocrinologist Charled Ihlenfeld, who stopped administering hormones to patients experiencing gender dysphoria, and guided them to therapy instead.
“If we take an individual’s self-declared gender identity as the sole necessary and sufficient condition for membership in a gender class, the result is that the meaning of the word ‘woman’ is reduced to a subjective mental state, to a feeling in a person’s head. The only answer to the question ‘what is a woman?’ becomes ‘a person who feels like a woman’. But this is an entirely circular definition that tells us nothing about what a woman is’.”
-Rebecca Reilly-Cooper, philosopher at Warwick University
“‘Assigned’ at birth. This phrase conjures up an image of a midwife maliciously and randomly putting a sinister label on an innocent infant.
Correctly identifying the genitals that a child possesses and therefore the biological sex to which they belong is not a matter of ‘assigning gender’ to the child; it is simply to recognise the biological facts and to give them the correct biological label.”
“I approach this topic with a wrenching awareness of what it feels like to be disconnected from your body, to hate with every fibre of your being the way you look in the mirror, and to be willing to undergo great feats of self-mutilation to achieve a vision that is always just out of grasp. My perspective on the matter, however, probably would not go over well among most LGBTQ individuals. As a person who has struggled with anorexia nervosa since puberty, the transgender anguish resonates with me. The similarities between the two illnesses are striking. Yet one is an identity, and the other is a disorder. Why?”
“At the heart of gender dysphoria is a paradoxical desire to be characterised as something one simultaneously declares is ineffable (i.e. gender roles are illusory cultural constructs, but I yearn to concretely embody that illusion). The contradictory desire in transgenderism is similar in hopelessness as the desire in anorexia. The goal is to be thin, and one is never thin enough until one is dead. The goal is to be a sex other than one’s biological makeup, and one cannot alter one’s chromosomes and genetic makeup.”
“While studying psychology in a university program I discovered that trans-kids most often are suffering from a variety of disorders, starting with depression - the result of personal loss, broken families, sexual abuse, and unstable homes.”
“Had I not been misled by media stories of sex change “success” and by medical practitioners who said transitioning was the answer to my problems, I wouldn’t have suffered as I have. Genetics can’t be changed. Feelings, however, can and do change. Underlying issues often drive the desire to escape one’s life into another, and they need to be addressed before taking the radical step of transition.
You will hear the media say, “Regret is rare.” But they are not reading my inbox, which is full of messages from transgender individuals who want the life and body back that was taken from them by cross-sex hormones, surgery and living under a new identity.
After de-transitioning, I know the truth: Hormones and surgery may alter appearances, but nothing changes the immutable fact of your sex.”
Former transgender woman who provides support to others who regret gender change at sexchangeregret.com.
Humanity is rapidly moving into an era of artificial intelligence and unprecedented amounts of radiation. The ever increasing technological advancement must not happen at the cost of our integrity, wellbeing, security, privacy or the health of our environment.
Currently there is a global push for a fundamental societal change into “smart” cities and “the Internet of Things”. Manifesting such a large scale technological system will require enormous amounts of new 5G antennas and cell towers, as well as tens of thousands of new satellites orbiting the Earth.
There are thousands of doctors and scientists who are speaking up against the risks of the radio frequency radiation caused by the new 5G wireless network technology.
The clinical evidence for the harmful effects of RF radiation is already overwhelming, with a literature base of more than 10,000 peer-reviewed studies. This vast amount of accumulated data points to a myriad of serious issues caused by electro- magnetic pollution.
There are 204,797 signatories from 203 nations and territories as of March 3rd, 2020 in the International Appeal to stop 5G in Earth and in Space:
“To the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all nations:
We the undersigned scientists, doctors, environmental organisations and citizens from (__) countries, urgently call for a halt to the deployment of the 5G (fifth generation) wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation on top of the 2G, 3G and 4G networks for telecommunications already in place. RF radiation has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.
Telecommunications companies worldwide, with the support of governments, are poised within the next two years to roll out the fifth-generation wireless network (5G). This is set to deliver what is acknowledged to be unprecedented societal change on a global scale. We will have “smart” homes, “smart” businesses, “smart” highways, “smart” cities and self-driving cars. Virtually everything we own and buy, from refrigerators and washing machines to milk cartons, hairbrushes and infants’ diapers, will contain antennas and microchips and will be connected wirelessly to the Internet. Every person on Earth will have instant access to super-high-speed, low- latency wireless communications from any point on the planet, even in rainforests, mid-ocean and the Antarctic.
What is not widely acknowledged is that this will also result in unprecedented environmental change on a global scale. The planned density of radio frequency transmitters is impossible to envisage. In addition to millions of new 5G base stations on Earth and 20,000 new satellites in space, 200 billion transmitting objects, according to estimates, will be part of the Internet of Things by 2020, and one trillion objects a few years later. Commercial 5G at lower frequencies and slower speeds was deployed in Qatar, Finland and Estonia in mid-2018. The rollout of 5G at extremely high (millimetre wave) frequencies is planned to begin at the end of 2018.
Despite widespread denial, the evidence that radio frequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming. The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilisation—cancer, heart disease and diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.
If the telecommunications industry’s plans for 5G come to fruition, no person, no animal, no bird, no insect and no plant on Earth will be able to avoid exposure, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to levels of RF radiation that are tens to hundreds of times greater than what exists today, without any possibility of escape anywhere on the planet. These 5G plans threaten to provoke serious, irreversible effects on humans and permanent damage to all of the Earth’s ecosystems.
Immediate measures must be taken to protect humanity and the environment, in accordance with ethical imperatives and international agreements.”
At Dawn of Peace, we see that although technology can be extremely helpful, we must remain masters of it and not the other way around. There already exists gadgets and software applications which are designed to be extremely addictive.
As soon as technology begins to steal our peace,
it can no longer be considered beneficial.
As sovereign beings, it must be made clear that regardless of any governmental policies, we have the absolute right to refuse any future brain-interface or neural implant technologies, embedded microchips, or any other attempts to hybridise us or alter our humanity.
We must deeply question the underlying reasons as to why human beings would possibly need to merge with machines.
There are already extremely clever propaganda tactics at play talking about the need to remove the “social stigma” of having a microchip, to educate those with “religious hysteria” and accept that it is simply an “inevitable step in our evolution”. This kind of language is designed to shape the majority to be in favour of hybridisation and ridicule those who stand in sovereignty.
It is clear to us at Dawn of Peace, that the more humanity blindly relies on artificial intelligence and machines, the more we also lose our inherent gifts. It is already being proved, that today’s high daily usage of “smart gadgets” with screens is resulting in increased levels of learning difficulties, issues with concentration, as well as problems with comprehension, writing and reading skills in children. The more we move into artificial realities, the further we fall away from our vital connection with the Natural world, and the abundant gifts in the present moment.
A fundamental part of our wellbeing stems from a living connection with our Mother Earth. There are innumerable studies about the benefits of being in Nature, from enhanced mood to improved short-term memory, from reduced levels of inflammation to a boost in immunity, from increased creativity to better vision and lower stress levels etc. It should not take a scientific study to convince anyone about the healing effects of Nature, for it should be the most obvious realisation to any human being. We are a part of the Natural world. It is, after all, our true home.
“The development of full artificial intelligence could spell the end of the human race….It would take off on its own, and re-design itself at an ever increasing rate. Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete, and would be superseded.”
-Stephen Hawking during an interview with the BBC
“I’m increasingly inclined to think that there should be some regulatory oversight, maybe at the national and international level, just to make sure that we don’t do something very foolish. I mean, with artificial intelligence we’re summoning the demon.”
-Elon Musk’s warning at MIT’s AeroAstro Centennial Symposium
‘Vitruvian Man’ by Leonardo da Vinci